FAQs
All FAQs
< Previous | Showing 181 to 190 | Next > | << Back to FAQ Categories
-
FAQ-99:
Are the government aggregation volumes in the data room already excluded from SSO supply customer usage data? What are the start and end dates of these Aggregation contracts?
Aggregation load is not included in the SSO load. It is considered a subset of the CRES load. Aggregation contracts can vary in both term and start and end dates. These are a function of the negotiations between municipalities that have approved aggregation initiatives and the CRES providers with whom they contract.
02/18/2016 in Data
-
FAQ-98:
In the webcast presentation dated January 13, 2016, you indicated a 2,627 MW PLC. What is this information based on?
The 2,627 MW PLC found on Slide 12 of the Bidder Information Webcast presentation dated January 13, 2016 is based on the five highest coincident peaks experienced by PJM in 2015 for SSO customers (i.e., non-shopping only) enrolled as of December 31, 2015. This number has not been weather adjusted. The MW-measure is provided for reference purposes only. The amount of actual quantity to be delivered depends on many factors (e.g., migration of SSO customers).
02/18/2016 in Data
-
FAQ-97:
Please confirm if the PLCs listed on the CBP Website are weather normalized, and if so please indicate the Weather Normalization Factor and the relevant time period that the factor is applied to as well as whether the Weather Normalization Factor is applied both data series “SSO_PLC” and “CRES_PLC”.
In responding to this question, we assumed that you are asking with reference to the daily PLC report posted to the CBP Website Data Room. For the daily PLC data starting June 1, 2015, the PLC data has been weather normalized and a Weather Normalization Factor of 7.62% has been applied to the daily PLCs for both the data series “SSO_PLC” and “CRES_PLC”. The Weather Normalization Factor of 5.85% will be applied to the data beginning on June 1, 2016.
02/16/2016 in Data
-
FAQ-96:
On February 1, 2016, PUCO Staff filed a report in Case No. 16-247-EL-UNC, which provides two options for conducting procurements to supply PIPP load for Ohio utilities, including AEP Ohio starting with the March 2016 Auction. How will the PUCO Staff Report in Case No. 16-247-EL-UNC regarding PIPP load impact AEP’s upcoming March 2016 Auction?
AEP Ohio is aware of the referenced Staff Report but will not be able to take any action with respect to the March 2016 auction in regards to the Staff Report in this particular docket, as the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“Commission”) has yet to rule on this particular docket. The PUCO maintains dockets for proceedings before the Commission. These dockets can be accessed via the Commission’s Docketing Information System at https://dis.puc.state.oh.us/. For information related to Case No. 16-247-EL-UNC, including comments filed by AEP Ohio and other parties in response to the Staff’s recommendation, , please visit PUCO’s website at: http://dis.puc.state.oh.us/CaseRecord.aspx?Caseno=16-0247&link=DI.
02/16/2016 in Other/General
-
FAQ-95:
Where can I find information about the Power Purchase Agreement ("PPA") Rider? Is it expected to impact the auction?
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“Commission”) maintains dockets for proceedings before the Commission. Please see Case Nos. 13-2385-ELO-SSO and 12-2386-EL-AAM, and Case No. 14-1693-EL-RDR and Case No. 14-1694-EL-AAM. These dockets can be accessed via the Commission’s Docketing Information System at https://dis.puc.state.oh.us/. Please consult these dockets for additional information.
01/29/2016 in CBP Rules
-
FAQ-94:
Please confirm that each tranche is equal to the MW-measure of about 27MW.
No. Each tranche represents a fixed percentage of SSO Load. The “MW-measure” provided is for reference purpose only and the amount of actual quantity to be delivered depends on many factors including migration of SSO-customers.
01/29/2016 in Supply Agreement
-
FAQ-93:
Will the webcast presentation be posted online for download?
Yes, the webcast presentation and the audio recordings have been posted to the CBP website.
01/29/2016 in Other/General
-
FAQ-92:
In regard to Attachment F (Sample PJM Invoice) of the Master SSO Supply Agreement, does AEP Ohio provide historical costs for each line item?
No, AEP Ohio does not provide such data.
01/20/2016 in Data
-
FAQ-91:
Does a SSO supplier need an electricity retail license in Ohio to provide SSO supply under the terms of the Master SSO Supply Agreement?
No, an Applicant to the AEP Ohio CBP does not need to hold an electricity retail license in Ohio. The Applicant must either: (1) be a PJM member in good standing and qualified by PJM as a “Market Buyer” and “Market Seller” pursuant to PJM Agreements and qualified as a PJM “Load Serving Entity”; or (2) certify that there exist no impediments for the Applicant to be qualified by PJM as a “Market Buyer” and “Market Seller” pursuant to PJM Agreements and to be qualified as a PJM “Load Serving Entity” by the start of the supply period. The Applicant must also undertake to be qualified by PJM as a “Market Buyer”, a “Market Seller” pursuant to PJM Agreements, and to be qualified as a PJM “Load Serving Entity” by the start of the supply period should the Applicant become an SSO Supplier.
01/19/2016 in Supply Agreement
-
FAQ-90:
Who is the contact person at AEP Ohio if I have a question related to the data available to SSO Suppliers under the terms of the Master SSO Supply Agreement?
This information is available upon request from the Auction Manager.
12/08/2015 in Data
< Previous | Showing 181 to 190 | Next > | << Back to FAQ Categories